From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Apr 18 0:13:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151DA37BC82 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19718 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id JAA00323 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9DC37B5EA; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:42:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA53729; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:42:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA87049; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:42:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200004180242.UAA87049@harmony.village.org> To: chris@calldei.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcsh - Imported sources Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:48:38 CDT." <20000417194838.D338@holly.calldei.com> References: <20000417194838.D338@holly.calldei.com> <20000416185507.B43688@linkfast.net> <200004180001.RAA28074@bubba.whistle.com> <200004180040.SAA10133@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:42:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'd support someone coming up with a complete set of these things, and then putting it up for review. It should implement traditional behavior AND NOTHING ELSE. No cool little this hack or that hack or anything of the sort. This falls under the tradtional behavior of csh category. Those that don't want it can disable it easily enough. What I don't want to see is every silly little issue causing a 10,000 message flame fest in -arch... I'd rather them be saved up so we can have only one (more) 10,000 message flame fest in -arch. :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message