From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 8 09:51:10 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id JAA20256 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 8 Jan 1995 09:51:10 -0800 Received: from saul4.u.washington.edu (saul4.u.washington.edu [140.142.83.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA20250 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 1995 09:51:09 -0800 Received: by saul4.u.washington.edu (5.65+UW94.10/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA27576; Sun, 8 Jan 95 09:50:52 -0800 X-Sender: spaz@saul4.u.washington.edu Date: Sun, 8 Jan 1995 09:50:52 -0800 (PST) From: John Utz To: Gene Stark Cc: FreeBSD Mailing lists , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Timeline of FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199501081218.HAA06008@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi; On Sun, 8 Jan 1995, Gene Stark wrote: > >Here is my revised timeline to date. Again, if anyone has any suggestions > >or corrections please relay them to me. > > > >Note: Any where you see a ``?'', this some place I'm not sure of the date. > > Also, if you see a history point that is wrong or missing, please let > > me know. I would have no excuse for having wrong information.:) > > Yes. > > This whole timeline thing may be an admirable goal and all, but > there are a number of errors of dates, chronology, and details in the > above. Furthermore, I don't think it really belongs in the -hackers list, why the heck not? > and further beyond that all you have to do is go get all the mail in > Warren Toomey's archives, and you will have the entire history of 386BSD > and FreeBSD in utter detail. How about doing that first? > that is kind of a good point..but will it have the real old stuff? > - Gene Stark > ******************************************************************************* John Utz spaz@stein.u.washington.edu idiocy is the impulse function in the convolution of life