Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:04:17 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, cokane@cokane.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: cpufreq import complete, acpi_throttling changed Message-ID: <200502091304.17896.jkim@niksun.com> In-Reply-To: <346a802205020909273c413d03@mail.gmail.com> References: <42068A5C.1030300@root.org> <42090EBE.1030202@root.org> <346a802205020909273c413d03@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 12:27 pm, Coleman Kane wrote: > Ooops. Sorry, I knew this. Uhm in that case, is the acpi_ppc driver > being brought in, or similar functionality? I really like the > auto-scaling that ppc does. We will be able to write a simple daemon to do the job, something like cpufreqd: http://cpufreqd.sourceforge.net/ That's what the API is for... Thanks, Jung-uk Kim > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:10:54 -0800, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: > > Coleman Kane wrote: > > > I have the same problem. Looking through the code, it looks > > > like the throttling code from acpi_cpu.c basically got moved > > > into acpi_perf.c. > > > > No. acpi throttling code moved to acpi_throttle.c. acpi_perf.c > > is a new driver. In any case, a powernow.c driver will > > eventually be committed to provide this functionality. You can > > keep using acpi_ppc for now. > > > > -- > > Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502091304.17896.jkim>