From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 12:23:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E156C106564A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FAF8FC0C for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q5MCNQxp041638 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:23:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:23:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201206221223.q5MCNQxp041638@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:23:09 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >> "We put clang because sponsors wanted it." > >> > > > > > > Sponsors didn't want clang. Sponsors wanted not to be encumbered by a GPLv3 > they are not. > programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. You don't know what you don't know, trollboi. Anything so much as -linked- with a libarary that is under GPLv3, *IS* subject to GPLv3 terms, -unless- the library has an express exclusion