Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:34:17 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/watchdogd watchdogd.c 
Message-ID:  <48003.1091050457@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:13:45 EDT." <20040728221345.GB19257@green.homeunix.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040728221345.GB19257@green.homeunix.org>, Brian Fundakowski Feldm
an writes:

>> Worse, if it had worked it would have prevented watchdogd from
>> detecting swap disk related issues.
>> 
>> The only kind of special treatment you should give a watchdog daemons
>> is negative benefits so that it will be more sensitive to trouble.
>
>The usage of real-time priority isn't really much of a negative benefit,
>either, though.

I wasn't aware of that.  It should be backed out or at least be made
very optional.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48003.1091050457>