Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:43:15 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, mjacob@feral.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anybody working on devd? Message-ID: <38117.1006972995@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:03:58 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011128125713.40174B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011128125713.40174B-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: >Note that the race can be fixed by modifying your source of events for >"the common application". Hence my recommendation (made after your post, >as I caught up) that devd/devfsd feed off of a /dev/somethinginparticular, >and that they generate event information on /dev/somethingmoregeneral, >[...] And where do you want to run the devd for jails ? Inside the jail ? Do you really want to spend a process per jail to be able to open a PTY in the jail ? It doesn't scale... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38117.1006972995>