From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 13:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8175216A42A for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C1943D49 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BE55CB3; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:35:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38677-06; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:35:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-129-91.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.129.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DFE5C78; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:35:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <44157518.4090102@mac.com> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:35:20 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Silbersack References: <20060129022943.GJ2341@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060130073935.GA702@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060313025812.S85735@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20060313025812.S85735@odysseus.silby.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I use gbde or geli? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:35:21 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote: [ ... ] >> Actually, even though you haven't mentioned the company, someone with >> the resources to consider breaking AES would probably not find it too >> difficult to find the company's name. You _have_ admitted that you >> are one of the people who knows the passphrase. > > Hey, if we come up with a good attack plan, do you think those people > would find us and hire us to do the attack? :) Of course they will. They'll make you an offer you can't refuse. :-) -- -Chuck