Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:29:05 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Jin Fang <jin.fang@utoronto.ca> Subject: Re: ipfw table bad command Message-ID: <20051215152905.GH51686@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <FCCA8DCC-EB0F-46F9-A8D6-8568EEC60730@mac.com> References: <021001c60003$6528ea80$1ec237c0@nms.noc.utoronto.ca> <FCCA8DCC-EB0F-46F9-A8D6-8568EEC60730@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:41:08PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Jin Fang wrote: > >Which version of freebsd has 'table' command been implemented into =20 > >ipfw? > >I try it in 5.2.1 to use: > ># ipfw table 1 add x.x.x.x/32 > >get: > >ipfw: bad command `table' >=20 > It was added somewhere around 5.3. Someone running 5.2.1 should =20 > update to 5.3, 5.4, or consider going to 6.0... >=20 Wrong. I committed ipfw tables support in sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c#1.60 while RELENG_5_BP is 1.70. That is, all of 5.>0 kernels should have it. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDoYvBqRfpzJluFF4RAhH0AJ9fYXihTWytkDciBBA/07eYdbNnbQCePlps jo1ZirqxXspg19P6yMP2k4w= =F+jZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051215152905.GH51686>