Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:12:51 +0100 From: Schaich Alonso <alonsoschaich@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Message-ID: <201202261212.51821.alonsoschaich@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F4A0E04.1080601@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EFDA80600B0354D@> <4F4A0E04.1080601@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-02-26 (Sunday) 11:48:36 O. Hartmann wrote: > On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even > >> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is > >> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE > >> was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated > >> version in the ports suited our needs. > >> > >> Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I > >> filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. > >> > >> I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use > >> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried > >> devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of > >> configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and > >> not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. > >> > >> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many > >> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, > >> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. > >> > >> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, > >> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the > >> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks > >> is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. > >> > >> Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm > >> also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity > >> to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE > >> is needed. > >> > >> Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. > > > > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on > > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to > > configure for use with clang/llvm. > > Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and > not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? > > By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated > and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent > version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. > > Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) > > >> Oliver devel/kdevelop-kde4 works well over here and is the lastest stable release. It can be configured to use llvm/clang for its projects, but llvm/clang cannot be used to build kdevelop (as all of qt/kde ports won't build with it until qt-4.8 gets into ports). Alonso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202261212.51821.alonsoschaich>