Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:47:43 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> Cc: Eric F Crist <ecrist@secure-computing.net>, freebsd-www@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The best scripts ever (trick or treat) Message-ID: <20051102204743.GA89885@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20051102204235.GC67144@thought.org> References: <20051101013050.GA10120@flame.pc> <20051101055104.GA15533@thought.org> <20051101121414.GB1051@flame.pc> <20051101185922.GB67660@thought.org> <2011CB42-5C96-4315-AD73-A17B39589CBF@secure-computing.net> <20051101222051.GA24702@thought.org> <20051102093907.GT29387@submonkey.net> <20051102200757.GA67144@thought.org> <20051102201439.GA37256@flame.pc> <20051102204235.GC67144@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-11-02 12:42, Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:14:40PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > > > > "CATEORY: foo > > > "FUNCTION: it_does_this > > > "OPTIONS: can_do_this_or_that" > > > > > > BEGINSCRIPT > > > !#/bin/sh > > > echo "hello world" > > > ENDSCRIPT > > > > What happens when the script itself contains a line that starts > > with one of the special "markup" lines? > > > > AFAIK, the only markup lines this would use would be > the <TAGS></TAGS>. A sh script might use the ">" or "<" > for redirection, but the conversion script would ignore > everything between > > BEGINSCRIPT > ENDSCRIPT > > which would make parsing straightforeward. Unless the shell script itself contains 'ENDSCRIPT' somewhere ;-) This is what I was referring to as "markup".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051102204743.GA89885>