Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:52:20 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system Message-ID: <1123584740.779.5.camel@spirit> In-Reply-To: <42F888AD.8070604@FreeBSD.org> References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org> <200508091737.23443.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42F888AD.8070604@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =E5=9C=A8 2005-08-09=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 12:42 +0200=EF=BC=8CFlorent Thoumie= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A [snip] > Default /var size will be bumped. If you're not doing a fresh While we seems not going to MFC portsnap on 6.0, will it be reasonable to bump the default /var value in 6.0-RELEASE so our users won't be surprised when they upgrade to 6.1? Just my 0.02 Yuan :-) Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/ --=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC+Irk/cVsHxFZiIoRAj/3AJ4taI0HaZSzlMY4supXqwZcoaSQ/ACdGRt7 bWy3+FTYTaPd9wdzeUOndnU= =3rNX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1123584740.779.5.camel>