From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  9 10:52:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638916A41F;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 10:52:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net)
Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8159E43D48;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 10:52:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net)
Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DE5EB50F6;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 18:52:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAFB1352C5;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 18:52:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 09060-14; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 18:52:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.217.12.83] (unknown [61.135.152.194])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991DD131DCF;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 18:52:27 +0800 (CST)
From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <42F888AD.8070604@FreeBSD.org>
References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org>
	<200508091737.23443.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
	<42F888AD.8070604@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9"
Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:52:20 +0800
Message-Id: <1123584740.779.5.camel@spirit>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frontfree.net
Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 10:52:40 -0000


--=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

=E5=9C=A8 2005-08-09=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 12:42 +0200=EF=BC=8CFlorent Thoumie=
=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
[snip]
> 	Default /var size will be bumped. If you're not doing a fresh

While we seems not going to MFC portsnap on 6.0, will it be reasonable
to bump the default /var value in 6.0-RELEASE so our users won't be
surprised when they upgrade to 6.1?

Just my 0.02 Yuan :-)

Cheers,
--=20
Xin LI <delphij delphij net>  http://www.delphij.net/

--=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBC+Irk/cVsHxFZiIoRAj/3AJ4taI0HaZSzlMY4supXqwZcoaSQ/ACdGRt7
bWy3+FTYTaPd9wdzeUOndnU=
=3rNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-8DiVZAK/K5Fx/jzMc/S9--