Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 12:06:45 +0000 From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Xen 4.2 PV fails to boot -CURRENT PV domU Message-ID: <C28354B7-1453-416A-9984-296BA9C76A0D@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <522DB6A2.5050205@citrix.com> References: <455A20DD-3985-45EC-AC51-A3AFD33180F1@netapp.com> <522DB6A2.5050205@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_944F1C76-F391-4502-BB9E-A7FA943EA7D0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, thanks, let me try your suggestion/patch. On Sep 9, 2013, at 13:53, Roger Pau Monn=E9 <roger.pau@citrix.com> = wrote: > May I ask if there's anything that prevents you from switching to the > PVHVM port? I wouldn't recommend using the i386 PV port. I was thinking that performance would be better, and resource = requirements lower. If that's not the case, I can certainly go the PVHVM = route. Lars --Apple-Mail=_944F1C76-F391-4502-BB9E-A7FA943EA7D0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQCVAwUBUi251dZcnpRveo1xAQLlcAP9Hxe+7SPJGU6PCvnOzuP4TdiZbfoWmfVt 1C/FdMnuj1u6raFTre7E3WmgdzTB/lnyDxzoMIn/lJxD11eAGjkzyisbQ6XGQKKM bMEt1pgj5L/qOzcYIXJaKUXMFqhyLSYkz813pbRBoWYwMYCiW+pjMRp+MS1PZBKW l88TSLtWdX8= =WosB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_944F1C76-F391-4502-BB9E-A7FA943EA7D0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C28354B7-1453-416A-9984-296BA9C76A0D>