Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:41:14 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r308655 - in head/games/xmoto: . files Message-ID: <2c086065eb33d54adac9a85832e9f8ad@mail.adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20121211132128.GA50148@hades.panopticon> References: <201212110314.qBB3EErH082058@svn.freebsd.org> <20121211033625.GA39028@FreeBSD.org> <20121211132128.GA50148@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012/12/11 08:21, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Not adding them to OPTIONS_DEFINE preserves previous behaviour and I > don't think NLS and DOCS should be in the OPTIONS_DEFINE ever - they > are > only meaningful to be set globally, and having them in individual > ports > makes large builds much more painful, as a user has to set them for > tons > of ports (even more painful without portmaster or knowing of > config-recursive). I think there is some benefit to explicitly adding them with discretion. Ports like ImageMagick, or the Berkeley DB ports, which install massive amounts of documentation, are really nice to be able to selectively disable DOCS for. I think port maintainers can put DOCS in OPTIONS in a meaningful and useful way. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2c086065eb33d54adac9a85832e9f8ad>