Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:28:59 -0800 From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which filrs/directories must be chowned bind? Message-ID: <20091205222859.GA49341@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <d36406630912051409x1fcb8841sfecbcaf7fcd33033@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091205064419.GA46204@thought.org> <d36406630912051409x1fcb8841sfecbcaf7fcd33033@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:09:24PM +0000, krad wrote: > 2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> > > > > > I've just finished getting > > > > % nslookup 10.47.0.230 > > > > to respond, so at least my test configuration is finally right > > ... or on the right track. I am not certain that I ever had > > things chowned bind:bind; even before my '07 meltdown. Now > > it's time to make certain that every file that should be owned > > by bind really *is*. > > > > Anybody? > > > > > Have a look at /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist > also dont use nslookup use host or dig. NSlookup is dodgy Re nslookup, it is still widely enough used that it ain't dead yet. But, yeah, I just found a tutorial-like page on dig. It's helpful for a utility that isn't that friendly. thanks for the mtree tip. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.31a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091205222859.GA49341>