Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:42:12 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>
Cc:        Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, msmith@mass.dis.org
Subject:   Re: Intel gigabit driver 
Message-ID:  <200111290042.fAT0gCA06193@mass.dis.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>  of "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:50:40 %2B0100." <3C057850.55E9BC99@pipeline.ch> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL)

Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license.

Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use.

> > The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to
> > -STABLE later.
> 
> Really? What about the gx driver?

The 'gx' driver was committed so that Jonathan's code would be on
record, since he'd spent so much time and effort on it.  Testing so
far has indicated that the Intel driver is generally superior, but
it's not a very BSD-like driver and under some circumstances this can
be considered a bad thing.

The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards.

 = Mike


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111290042.fAT0gCA06193>