Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:06:42 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4 Message-ID: <00Mar15.110646est.115425@border.alcanet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200003141832.NAA84317@blackhelicopters.org>; from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:33:56AM %2B1100 References: <2164.953047401@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> <200003141832.NAA84317@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-Mar-15 05:33:56 +1100, Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> wrote: >Also, RELENG-3 is still there. I just supped it yesterday. RELENG_3 will exist for evermore. At time passes, fewer changes will be made to it. You can still get RELENG_2_0, RELENG_2_1 and RELENG_2_2. The only reason you can't get RELENG_1 is that it was based on the NET/2 code, which was all expunged as a condition of the AT&T/USL lawsuit. >IMHO, I'd treat this just like the upgrade from 2.x.2 to 3.0; I believe 4.0-RELEASE will be more stable than 3.0-RELEASE, and the upgrade procedure should be cleaner, but it will have a few rough edges. I wouldn't recommend putting 4.0 into production without thorough testing. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00Mar15.110646est.115425>