Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:54:09 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile ports/net/rsync/files patch-251-secfix Message-ID: <20020124175409.B18609@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200201242118.g0OLIHi85482@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020123190443.49432B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1011831273.264.49.camel@notebook> <20020123195726.T18609@squall.waterspout.com> <200201242118.g0OLIHi85482@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > This seems exceedingly broken to me. There is only one dependency; > what (other than inertia) prevents you from manually rebuilding the > relevant packages and updating the INDEX file appropriately? Looks to > me like ten minutes' work at most. It is exceedingly difficult to ensure an uncontaminated package without a portbuild. You'd be surprised at the kinds of things that can sneak in unnoticed until it causes a problem for someone who's using release packages. Regards, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020124175409.B18609>