From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 21 20:16:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94CF16A416; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E52613C459; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0LKFElw010376; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:15:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45B3C9D0.7000401@samsco.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:15:12 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <45B28A31.4080604@samsco.org> <20070121131229.014eda2e@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070121.084719.-233674217.imp@bsdimp.com> <200701212037.25404.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200701212037.25404.max@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:15:20 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, netchild@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, sam@errno.com, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:16:47 -0000 Max Laier wrote: > On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:47, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <20070121131229.014eda2e@Magellan.Leidinger.net> >> >> Alexander Leidinger writes: >> : I was thinking more about something like: >> : to print identifier to use in the >> : kernel sizeof() %zd >> : int64_t xyz >> : int32_t klm >> : ... ... >> >> The last two aren't possible to print without casts, or the PRI_xxx >> macros. > > That's right, but I think we can fix it by simply making int64_t an alias > for "long long" on all architectures. I still haven't heard any reason > not to just do this - is there something, other than historical? > I'm sure that Bruce can tell you in great detail why this is a good or bad idea. Scott