Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:49:02 -0600
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <199907280449.WAA29417@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907272247490.64223-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
References:  <199907271915.NAA26782@mt.sri.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907272247490.64223-100000@janus.syracuse.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about:
> 	per-rule logging limits
> 	logging limit raising
> 	logging limit resetting
> Which would all NOT affect the statistics?

We need more input from people who use the code, to make sure they don't
depend on the current 'features', or can live with changes to them.

Implementing it is the easy part, making sure it's the right thing to do
is the hard part.


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907280449.WAA29417>