Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:20:00 GMT From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/182862: x11-fonts/croscorefonts-fonts-ttf : add some more fonts. Message-ID: <201310171920.r9HJK0j6074579@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/182862; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: <giffunip@tutopia.com> Cc: <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/182862: x11-fonts/croscorefonts-fonts-ttf : add some more fonts. Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:14:11 +0300 <giffunip@tutopia.com> writes: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:35:32 +0300, Raphael Kubo da Costa > <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Since these new fonts are not part of ChromeOS's core fonts >> collection >> (if we can call it that way), wouldn't it make more sense to follow >> upstream and have a separate port for ChromeOS extra fonts? > > To be honest, I am not sure if we can/should clasify them in the same > package. > They do share in common that they are metric-compatible to MS fonts > and they > are in the same site. > > FWIW, this looks like the homesite for the Google collection: > > https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/ My opinion isn't really worth anything here, but I'd rather separate croscorefonts from crosextrafonts as upstream does, but not go as far as separate crosextrafonts from crosextrafonts-carlito (which upstream does for some weird reason): https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/master/media-fonts/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201310171920.r9HJK0j6074579>