Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:14:31 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? Message-ID: <1118736871.39418.14.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050614070006.GA27141@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456EA37@VIP10-WIN2K> <1118670027.59181.32.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050613120414.V65109@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506132356.01937.groot@kde.org> <1118701494.34657.8.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050614070006.GA27141@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David O'Brien p=ED=B9e v =FAt 14. 06. 2005 v 00:00 -0700:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:24:54AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > I think NIC and RAID columns are a bit overkill
>=20
> Why? Those two devices are the ones most likely to give trouble - after
> basic booting.
Agreed. Any problems encountered with them should be of course noted in
Notes column, and their device nodes/drivers can be read from dmesgs.
And of course, I'm lazy boy and as such oppose any change that would
bring me a lot of work :)
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Me go and see Elves and all! Hooray!
--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCrpHnntdYP8FOsoIRAskrAKCnm/IB6JT35UV/Ao1C4K6JFXwd9wCgohRO
X/xO1vLTBlTWoRKGUymR/QE=
=9rmU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1118736871.39418.14.camel>