Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Apr 1998 00:10:27 -0700
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        walton@nordicdms.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ftpd vs. wu-ftpd vs. ? 
Message-ID:  <199804250710.AAA12051@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 24 Apr 1998 20:22:28." <19980425032228720.AAA219@mail.nordicdms.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Between the ftpd bundled with 2.2.6R and wu-ftpd, is there any 
>particular reason to use one over the other?  What's the difference 
>between them?  What does ftp.cdrom.com use, and why?

   wu-ftpd has a large selection of features, but is a total (memory/CPU) pig
because of it. The stock ftpd is much less of a pig but has far fewer
features. Wcarchive runs "dg-ftpd", which is my own version (and not publicly
available).

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804250710.AAA12051>