Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:00:29 +0800 From: Irjohn Junus <i.junus@gmail.com> To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <hskuhra@fastmail.fm> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel(R) PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter not working properly Message-ID: <CALXkR%2B_9=f=NM=nHi=Ti0D9nsijbupZqUrTwxcaaoJ=4oP4M5A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87vcmjap5s.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm> References: <CALXkR%2B8mdfnx3GwYknmVT4X8gJHM42PXz-9Vf__E0x%2BZbzM-_A@mail.gmail.com> <87vcmjap5s.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Herbert. I bought another Intel CT to test and it work flawlessly, so it was a bad PT adapter. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra <hskuhra@fastmail.fm>wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:39:01 +0800 > Irjohn Junus <i.junus@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This was originally posted here: > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=168854&posted=1#post168854 > > > > I'm building a new PF firewall box based on FreeBSD 9 Release. > Motherboard > > is Foxconn H61S Mini-ITX with Intel PRO/1000 PT dual port server adapter. > > > > The adapter is recognized as em0 and em1 but em0 just won't work (i.e no > > light on the port when connected to the switch) and em1 works only in > > 100baseTX full-duplex mode (no carrier if I force it to 1000baseT). I > tried > > to change switch port, UTP cable from Cat5e to Cat6 but still no luck. > The > > onboard Realtek works fine. Switch is Netgear GS608. Could it be a bad > > Intel card? > > > > I also tried to compile the latest driver from Intel but it gives error > > during compilation: > > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/conf...&Dwnldid=17509<; > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/confirm.aspx?httpDown=http://downloadmirror.intel.com/17509/eng/em-7.2.4.tar.gz&lang=eng&Dwnldid=17509 > > > > > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! > > > > ps: command captures are provided at the url above. > > Maybe you should test with 8.3-BETA1. The recent em1000 drivers (7.3.0?) > were mfc'ed to stable/8 January 31st but not to stable/9. > > See: > > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net/34946>; > <http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230848>; > > -- > Herbert >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALXkR%2B_9=f=NM=nHi=Ti0D9nsijbupZqUrTwxcaaoJ=4oP4M5A>