Date: 26 Jun 1999 13:55:57 +0200 From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld <frodef@acm.org> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bt848 channel frequencies Message-ID: <2hzp1n9nw2.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> In-Reply-To: Juha Nurmela's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:28:42 %2B0300 (EEST)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906252306200.4112-100000@pena.oh5nxo.ampr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Juha Nurmela <junki@qn-lpr2-98.quicknet.inet.fi> writes: > Meaning, the db would provide (customizable) defaults for vision > and sound, if none were provided by individual apps. Yep, agreed. > Also, the datatype for 'frequency' should be wide enough for > satellite and long-wave work, from few kHz to tens of GHz. I believe your typical "long" scales to 4.2 GHz if the unit is a single Hz. Does anyone know of tuning applications that would require a granularity smaller than one KHz? What about the different radio bands, for example? Or would it be better to use a 64-bit type to represent frequencies? Then we could go from uHz to GHz without problems.. :-) -- Frode Vatvedt Fjeld To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2hzp1n9nw2.fsf>