From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  6 02:36:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6533E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Feb 2004 02:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9012743D46
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Feb 2004 02:36:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from roam@ringlet.net)
Received: (qmail 22842 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2004 10:36:09 -0000
Received: from office.casyst.com (HELO straylight.m.ringlet.net)
	(212.91.166.145)
	by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 6 Feb 2004 10:36:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 76970 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Feb 2004 10:38:34 -0000
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:38:33 +0200
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: Alex <tmp@tern.ru>
Message-ID: <20040206103833.GD4848@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Alex <tmp@tern.ru>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
References: <614479869.20040206131706@tern.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <614479869.20040206131706@tern.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:36:56 -0000


--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:17:06PM +0300, freebsd@tern.ru wrote:
> Dear All.
>=20
> I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule.
> The only way that looks like what I need is
>=20
> # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3
>=20
> But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all
> packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?!
>=20
> No other syntax works.
> For example more logically correct
> not IP2 AND not IP3
> or even
> not { IP2 or IP3 }
> are understood by ipfw2

Could you try
  ipfw add count from IP1 to not { IP2,IP3 }

G'luck,
Peter

--=20
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@sbnd.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If I had finished this sentence,

--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAI26p7Ri2jRYZRVMRAl34AJ40qLbrb7KzFPa/z9MUFYLMy6/6xQCfbCwe
EnmffqdUJ+EAD5dt4r8/WRY=
=9pEN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74--