Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:26:36 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack
Message-ID:  <6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40@209.112.4.2>
In-Reply-To: <20040421165454.GB20049@lum.celabo.org>
References:  <6.0.3.0.0.20040420125557.06b10d48@209.112.4.2> <xzp65buh5fa.fsf@dwp.des.no> <6.0.3.0.0.20040420144001.0723ab80@209.112.4.2> <200404201332.40827.dr@kyx.net> <20040421111003.GB19640@lum.celabo.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421121715.04547510@209.112.4.2> <20040421165454.GB20049@lum.celabo.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:54 PM 21/04/2004, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:30:40PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> > One other technique that might help with respect to this attack is what
> > Cisco implemented, commonly known as the "TTL hack"
> >
> > http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/hack.html
>
>More commonly known as GTSM and RFC 3682.


Are there any "bad things" that can happen by doing this ?

         ---Mike 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40>