From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 16 12:38:50 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA14418 for current-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:38:50 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA14394 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:38:07 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA24837; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:37:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA14966; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:37:53 +0200 Message-Id: <199506161937.VAA14966@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: DES, crypt and eBones Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:37:52 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.Org Precedence: bulk > telnet[d] with kerberization should go in eBones, since eBones was > to replace the kerberization stuff supplied by 4.4BSD lite. Garrett > had some grand plan here, but has dropped the ball when the eBones > stuff was done (Not his fault, this was taken over by some one else > who has been unavaliable to maintain it). So I take that going ahead and moving this (telnet[d]) will not be considered a hostile action? ;-) (I won't do any committing for a while - just till I get the feel of it). BTW - was the other person by any chance Geoff Rehmet? I have chatted to him on the phone and emailed him (A while back). You're right - he's busy! > > > Binary sets should match source sets, otherwise you are heading for > > > trouble :-(. > > > > I'd buy this if there was not so much crosstalk between the packages. > > Solutions? One possible one is to move libraries to secure? (yuk) > > I need a better picture in my head of just what is going on in there > right now. I have not looked at that part of the tree since it was > changed from the original 4.4 lite code and am not so sure that the > initial change was a good idea at all... You preferred the actual Kerberos? I know someone in Britain who has a 4.4 CDROM with this on and I could do a replacement job... M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200