Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 04:27:31 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linking standalone NASM binary with libc Message-ID: <20050902032731.GC77862@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20050830111109.GB80696@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20050830032917.GA39730@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20050830103702.GA80388@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050830104359.GA43823@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20050830111109.GB80696@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:11:09PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: : I'm sure others can think of more points in support or linking to libc : and against linking to it :-) Most of what I want to do is low-level encryption... like copy protection routines. I love those. So who needs libc for that? ;-) Jonathon McKitrick -- Hoppiness is a good beer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050902032731.GC77862>