Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 02:09:09 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! Message-ID: <19990315020909.A1841@titan.klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903141938270.10542-100000@sonic.digital-web.net>; from Joseph Scott on Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 07:41:19PM -0500 References: <19990315001521.A39079@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903141938270.10542-100000@sonic.digital-web.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 07:41:19PM -0500, Joseph Scott wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > See the links in my signature ... > > > > Enjoy it ... Linux brings 0% performance gain in the "stable" system > > SMP arena ...... > > I took a quick look and it's eat to have some numbers with these > features. I'm not likely to get my hands on multiproc. machines so I was > hoping that someone would do something like this. > > Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2 > kernel? I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current", > etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against > FBSD 3.1 No, have no such system up and running. 3.1 is -STABLE now, 2.x is not supported anymore. And ... 2.x doesn't have SMP... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990315020909.A1841>