From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 24 08:53:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA19115 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA19109 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1/Spinner) with ESMTP id XAA21423; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 23:52:24 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199809241552.XAA21423@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: ben@rosengart.com cc: Andre Oppermann , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.0-19980923-BETA/ In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:25:49 -0400." Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 23:52:24 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Would this be useful? Too much? Too little? THis is different to what > > we had before where commits to all branches were lumped in together. > > This sounds good, except I think one should be able to get src commits > without docs commits. docs commits are pretty rare (compared to src and ports commits).. I was thinking about the situation where one could end up with 30 cvs-xyz lists again. But yes, I could understand cvs-doc and cvs-www being desirable to be seperate. > Ben > > "You have your mind on computers, it seems." > Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message