From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  2 13:42:45 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8C11065672;
	Wed,  2 May 2012 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D11A8FC0C;
	Wed,  2 May 2012 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id BCB847300A; Wed,  2 May 2012 16:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:02:35 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20120502140235.GA91732@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20120502114115.GG31034@azathoth.lan>
	<CA+hQ2+gv+Q7SXbK-G5Lybjt4XOF_b3EvyxtQiOCL7pGxmgWRcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120502123149.GI31034@azathoth.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120502123149.GI31034@azathoth.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Switching /etc/*.db from bdb to tinycdb
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:42:45 -0000

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:31:49PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
...
> > > Why importing to libc? to allow all the get*ent to parse the /etc/*.db
> > > files
> > >
> > 
> > just curious, where do we have  the bdb 1.85 routines now ?
> > Are they all in libc, or split between libc and libutil ?
> 
> All in libc

ok then it makes sense to preserve the structure and have
everything in libc as des suggested. Just a curiosity again,
any estimate of code size ?

cheers
luigi