Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 18:25:59 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp> To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which LAN PCCARD for FreeBSD (no PAO!) Message-ID: <36FDF5A7.417600CC@sky.rim.or.jp> References: <199903251636.RAA04214@greatoak.home> <199903270255.CAA28337@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> <199903272106.OAA05479@mt.sri.com> <199903280328.MAA01166@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thread like this is repeated many times... We should clearify what is
problem about this. I don't like flames like this.
Nate Williams wrote:
> No no no. You got it all wrong. PAO support is buggy, FreeBSD APM is
> good, and PCCARD support is limited. :) :) :)
Nate, I think what you want to say about "PAO support is buggy" is an
approach for bus-architectural things and handling of kernel options.
I think you didn't say "everything in PAO is not useful", right?
Motoyuki Konno wrote:
> Why do you think "PAO support is buggy"? Do you read the recent
> PAO patch? If you found bugs in PAO, please list up them.
IMHO, PAO has much of "work around" approach to solve problem. And PAO
has much of "#ifdef"s for experimental and product specific codes. I
don't know who maintains these codes and whether
currently used or not.
PAO has Japanese version of man page for pccardc. Should we translate
it into English?
We should re-hack PAO code to separate by functionallity. And let's
post -mobile and -current for reviewing.
--
Jun Kuriyama // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp
// kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36FDF5A7.417600CC>