Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:40:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet icmp_var.h ip_icmp.c ip_input.c ip_mroute.c ip_output.c ip_var.h src/usr.bin/netstat inet.c Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011207123930.44662B-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200112070923.fB79NFg12719@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: :ru 2001/12/07 01:23:15 PST : : Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) : sys/netinet icmp_var.h ip_icmp.c ip_input.c : ip_mroute.c ip_output.c ip_var.h : usr.bin/netstat inet.c : Log: : MFC: : : sys/netinet icmp_var.h 1.19, ip_icmp.c 1.64, ip_input.c 1.185, : ip_mroute.c 1.69, ip_output.c 1.143, ip_var.h 1.59 : usr.bin netstat/inet.c 1.52 : : - Make ip_rtaddr() global, and use it to look up the correct source : address in icmp_reflect(). : - Two new "struct icmpstat" members: icps_badaddr and icps_noroute. : - Allow for ip_output() to be called with a NULL route pointer. I thought it was brought up at the -current commit time that being allowed to pass a NULL route pointer to ip_output() was a solution, but not the most ideal... Am I incorrect? : : PR: kern/31575, kern/29337, kern/30524 : : Revision Changes Path : 1.15.2.2 +3 -1 src/sys/netinet/icmp_var.h : 1.39.2.11 +22 -21 src/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c : 1.130.2.29 +16 -14 src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c : 1.56.2.3 +2 -3 src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c : 1.99.2.21 +6 -4 src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c : 1.50.2.5 +3 -1 src/sys/netinet/ip_var.h : 1.37.2.8 +6 -1 src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011207123930.44662B-100000>