From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 22:47:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7413106567B for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846958FC0A for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KFL003J1DZW8L60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:47:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work2.kg4.no ([80.203.109.110]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with SMTP id <0KFL00AJZDZWSVA0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:47:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:47:56 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20090224234756.cd59ce2d.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-reply-to: <200902240058.31212.kstewart@owt.com> References: <200902240058.31212.kstewart@owt.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH Subject: Re: Old /etc files back, or cvs error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:47:59 -0000 On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:58:31 -0800 Kent Stewart wrote: > You are looking at the version for the 7.1 release version. The > RELENG_7 version is The real question is: why are the files in 7.1-release newer than those in RELENG_7? In other words: why haven't those files been updated in RELENG_7? Are there something wrong with the newer files? For RELENG_7 users it is inconvenient to have to go through all these files every time a 7.1-release install gets updated to RELENG_7. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen