Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:40:41 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r411147 - head Message-ID: <201603151940.u2FJefek069489@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:49:11 %2B0100." <56E84B17.3070809@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <56E84B17.3070809@gmx.de>, olli hauer writes: > On 2016-03-15 14:39, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <201603151031.u2FAVrif078706@repo.freebsd.org>, Olli Hauer = > > writes: > >> Author: ohauer > >> Date: Tue Mar 15 10:31:53 2016 > >> New Revision: 411147 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411147 > >> > >> Log: > >> - add note for VDA users how to stay on postfix-2.11.x > > = > > Would it not be a good idea to also keep the legacy version of postfix= in = > > the tree for a while? Possibly deprecating it with a best before date? > > = > = > Is there a special requirement for postfix-3.0.x? > = > At the moment we have 3 versions (+ additional ${port}-sasl) in the tree= : > postfix-2.11.7 -> mail/postfix211 > postfix-3.1.0 -> mail/postfix > postfix-3.2.20160314 -> mail/postfix-current > = > Postfix 2.8 was the last official supported version for VDA but the VDA = patch also works with > 2.11.x > = > 2.11.7 is at the moment the last version from the 2.x line and I don't p= lan to remove it unti > l it is no longer supported by Wietse (I suspect at last one or more yea= rs) > = > I really don't see the need to keep an additional postfix-3.0.x (legacy)= port in the tree, bu > t if there are good arguments I can change my mind ;) You're probably right here.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201603151940.u2FJefek069489>