Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:48:16 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: Tony Sterrett <tonyste@pacbell.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: none Message-ID: <874r1ag4bz.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> In-Reply-To: <C4BCA992-BE4A-11D7-B528-000A957FF666@pacbell.net> (Tony Sterrett's message of "Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:50:36 -0700") References: <C4BCA992-BE4A-11D7-B528-000A957FF666@pacbell.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-07-25T02:50:36Z, Tony Sterrett <tonyste@pacbell.net> writes: > Like all of my action this is the result of a requirement. Yeah, I get the "interesting" requests, too. > I'm required to run two by nametech to register it, They said "they can > even be on one box". Can they be the same instance of BIND, as in, setting it up to listen on two addresses? > In our configuaration, one machine faces the internet and there is a > number of computers behind the firewall which use NAT. I would like to run > the slave on a internal box but as the addresses are funky due to NAT. I'm doing that exact thing with BIND 9. It's "views" features allows you to give multiple answers for a query depending on the address of the machine asking. On my LAN, "kanga.honeypot.net" resolves to 10.0.5.16. The same query from outside my LAN returns 208.162.254.122. Maybe that could help you? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/IScQ5sRg+Y0CpvERAjJoAJ49N9Bz9gksWUYlsQ9+IoJDRySepQCeMfST wx6zqGgEVr3H1gb/fX9UiSk= =E6ps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?874r1ag4bz.fsf>