Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      08 Jan 2001 13:52:22 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>, Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is there any reason for FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS?
Message-ID:  <xzpn1d2i4u1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:01:12 %2B0200"
References:  <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010105124725.D10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101051416230.52070-100000@juil.domain> <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <5.0.2.1.2.20010105135621.024d0550@192.168.1.50>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> Needless complexity, especially considering that `-b' is compatibility 
> option which is likely to be deleted soon

I have no plans to remove support for the -b and -t options any time
soon. I simply don't see any reason to do so.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn1d2i4u1.fsf>