From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 8 4:52:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD8E37B400; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 04:52:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA93567; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:52:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Peter Pentchev , Ilya Martynov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is there any reason for FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS? References: <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010105124725.D10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <5.0.2.1.2.20010105135621.024d0550@192.168.1.50> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Jan 2001 13:52:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:01:12 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim Sobolev writes: > Needless complexity, especially considering that `-b' is compatibility > option which is likely to be deleted soon I have no plans to remove support for the -b and -t options any time soon. I simply don't see any reason to do so. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message