Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 03:56:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> To: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@neomedia.it> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hmm.. restrict_rst & drop_synfin Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004210350130.74718-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <20000421.8481400@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Salvo Bartolotta wrote: [...] : RTFM, RTFM, RTFM ... :-) Argh, point recieved and understood. That, is a nasty habit of mine, I don't RTFM on things that I believe I understand. I made the rather false assumption that anything in /etc/defaults/rc.conf would not require any special kernel modifications, even linux_enable loads the module for you. I still believe it's worth documenting in defaults/rc.conf though, I can't be the only one bitten by this confusing thing. [...] : I have yet to understand what difference (efficience ? Type and level : of action ?), if any, there is between these options and the ipfw : firewall rules performing analogous functions (ie deny [...] tcpflags : <corresponding_flag>) ... Nor have I, I just find it easier to maintain personally. To be honest, low level kernel and tcp/ip functions are far beyond my skill and knowledge at the moment, but I'm learning. : RTFM, RTFM, RTFM (myself, this time) :-) : : Best regards, : Salvo Matt Heckaman matt@arpa.mail.net http://www.lucida.qc.ca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5AAnBdMMtMcA1U5ARAtxEAJ4wrWK4Vl+ZHZpXd9WZ7JMCXbcEawCgoPGV MovULeNIqT2aI7JJHWLo2Ng= =6xyA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004210350130.74718-100000>