Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 15:48:32 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ps -e Message-ID: <199911152248.dAFMmaQ18726@orthanc.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:18:24 PST." <199911152218.OAA45512@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes:
Matthew> Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we
Matthew> are at it considering how much of a security hole it is.
I wouldn't nuke it completely. Make -e a noop unless the real uid ps
is running with matches the effective uid of the process being reported.
And if ps is invoked with a real uid of 0, -e works as it does now.
--lyndon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911152248.dAFMmaQ18726>