Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:34:41 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: i386 cpu_reset_real: code/comment mismatch Message-ID: <200805201534.42201.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <48331F69.3070205@icyb.net.ua> References: <1210616585.00069210.1210605002@10.7.7.3> <200805201124.23850.jhb@freebsd.org> <48331F69.3070205@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 02:58:49 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/05/2008 18:24 John Baldwin said the following: > > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 09:37:54 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> BTW, I understand that there is a difference between hard and soft reset > >> in terms of hardware signals being asserted, but I don't quite > >> understand general consequences. I.e. what is a practical difference > >> between hard and soft reset? > > > > I've no idea. It may be that we should just always do a hard reset as that is > > in effect what both Solaris and Linux do. I'll probably just change it to do > > that. > > But I think it is already how the code works (maybe with extra port > write that couldn't hurt anything). Right, I'll probably just update the comment and remove the '0x2' write. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200805201534.42201.jhb>