From owner-cvs-other Tue Sep 13 23:41:00 1994 Return-Path: cvs-other-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id XAA09650 for cvs-other-outgoing; Tue, 13 Sep 1994 23:41:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA09643; Tue, 13 Sep 1994 23:40:55 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) cc: csgr@omega.ru.ac.za, gclarkii@freefall.cdrom.com, ache@freefall.cdrom.com, adam@freefall.cdrom.com, alm@freefall.cdrom.com, ats@freefall.cdrom.com, bde@freefall.cdrom.com, csgr@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-other@freefall.cdrom.com, davidg@freefall.cdrom.com, dfr@freefall.cdrom.com, dyson@freefall.cdrom.com, gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com, guido@freefall.cdrom.com, hsu@freefall.cdrom.com, joerg@freefall.cdrom.com, julian@freefall.cdrom.com, jvh@freefall.cdrom.com, karl@freefall.cdrom.com, martin@freefall.cdrom.com, nate@freefall.cdrom.com, paul@freefall.cdrom.com, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, proven@freefall.cdrom.com, pst@freefall.cdrom.com, rgrimes@freefall.cdrom.com, rich@freefall.cdrom.com, se@freefall.cdrom.com, sean@freefall.cdrom.com, sef@freefall.cdrom.com, smace@freefall.cdrom.com, sos@freefall.cdrom.com, torstenb@freefall.cdrom.com, wollman@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: gnu/usr.bin/texinfo - Imported sources In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Sep 94 02:42:41 BST." <199409140142.CAA02433@isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1994 23:40:54 -0700 Message-ID: <9642.779524854@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: cvs-other-owner@freefall.cdrom.com Precedence: bulk > Umm, I rather thought the opposite happened actually. We ended up adopting > the Linux SGML doc creation package and people started converting docs > like there was no tomorrow. It a pity all our fruitless discussions aren't > so "inconclusive" :-) Hmmm. I never saw any commits to the docs in our tree - did I miss something? I saw Olliver's stuff, but that was all in HTML.. I also did not see the SGML doc creation package make it into the tree. I sort of think that it missed its chance! If the SGML proponents had been quicker off the mark we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion. Jordan