Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:22:43 -0500
From:      Phusion <phusion2k@gmail.com>
To:        jason <jason@ec.rr.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HZ=100 ?? vmware
Message-ID:  <c3ed3fdc04101414222d500bc@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <416EE0D6.5050805@ec.rr.com>
References:  <20041014195717.535e39f7.dick@nagual.st> <416EE0D6.5050805@ec.rr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I run VMware3 on FreeBSD 5.2.1 fine. I use HZ=1200, and that seems
to work perfect. I've tested and found that 1000, and even 1100 still
gave me "rtc: 100 > kern.hz" messages. When I set HZ=1200 I got no
more of these messages.


On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:25:58 -0400, jason <jason@ec.rr.com> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
> 
> >Okey, I found out I need to increase the HZ=100 default in the kernel
> >config to a higher number. I also understand it decreases  system
> >response times.
> >
> >So, what I need to know is the lowest setup for HZ=??? to be able to run
> >vmware3 in full screen. I got to get rid of the "rtc: 100 > kern.hz"
> >prompt.
> >
> >Google tells me to increase to HZ=1200 but is this not too high?
> >
> >
> >
> In man polling a kernel config of HZ=1000 is the default if you want to
> use polling.  I am not sure, but if vmware is using the same HZ setting
> as polling does then 1200 is not too high.  If I understand it right,
> the HZ setting tells stuff how often to checkin to see if work needs
> doing.  100hz would be way too low.  Every 100hz on say a 2ghz machince
> would requirer you to spend a lot of time on something every
> sec(2billion/100 per sec if I am right).  Maybe nothing because you are
> delaying some programs that you want to execute, not pause and wait
> every 100hz.  This would most likely slow everything down, a higher
> number would make things smoother and faster, but only to a point.  Its
> kind of complicated, but when you find the right spot(somewhere in the
> middle) everything is good.  If you had a 4ghz machince you may want an
> even larger number.  If I am wrong I am sure there will be a followup
> shortly.
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c3ed3fdc04101414222d500bc>