Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Apr 2000 23:10:50 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Import of tcsh into src/contrib/, replacing src/usr.bin/csh
Message-ID:  <38ED6DDA.3771B1A5@softweyr.com>
References:  <20000406134916.A23265@dragon.nuxi.com> <200004062121.PAA24162@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000406144502.A25177@dragon.nuxi.com> <200004062150.PAA24400@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000406150728.A25607@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 03:50:49PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > I don't want a fully functional workstation.  I want a root account that
> > > is useful.
> >
> > It's completely useful.  It has everything you need.  What does tcsh
> > provide you that csh doesn't provide you that is needed for root?
> 
> Command line completion, and something other than bazzar "!^?-" history
> substitution.  Shell evolution (and other command line tools) have shown
> that either Emacs or Vi -style line editing is the way to go.  No one has
> adopted the bazzar Csh history substitution syntax.

^No one^Only Wes^

> > > I am also tired of explaining to Linux users why our /bin/csh doesn't
> > > have as nice a UI as tcsh.
> >
> > That's a *really* bad reason to bring in csh, and you know it.
> 
> No I don't know it.  You obvioulsy haven't had to fight to keep research
> labs using FreeBSD over Linux.

Is it really that hard to 'pkg_add /cdrom/packages/shells/tcsh*' ?
Add it to the default system, just don't REPLACE /bin/csh with it.
Make it root's default shell, even.

> > PicoBSD is just *one* of the many, many, many uses for small embedded
> > system.
> 
> List them.  These small embedded system developers can grab the old csh
> sources from the Attic and import them into their own source tree.

Oh, yeah, that's a great tack.

> > > As would Tcsh.
> >
> > If both are adequate, choose the smaller of the two since it benefits
> > more folks that way. ;)
> 
> I dissagree.  ;)    Perhaps a poll?
> 
> > > The need is our root's shell is crappy.
> >
> > I disagree, but what's stopping you from using tcsh as root's shell?
> 
> It isn't part of the base system.

So solve that problem without creating a bunch more.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38ED6DDA.3771B1A5>