Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:11:10 +0200
From:      marius@alchemy.franken.de
To:        Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssl Makefileports/security/openssl/files patch-Configure patch-config
Message-ID:  <20030403211110.A999@newtrinity.zeist.de>
In-Reply-To: <200304031824.h33IOrrb070905@repoman.freebsd.org>; from dinoex@freebsd.org on Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:24:53AM -0800
References:  <200304031824.h33IOrrb070905@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:24:53AM -0800, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> dinoex      2003/04/03 10:24:53 PST
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     security/openssl     Makefile 
>     security/openssl/files patch-Configure 
>   Added files:
>     security/openssl/files patch-config 
>   Log:
>   - honor CC and use PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_FLAGS
>   marius@alchemy.franken.de
>   

Well, thanks, but did you dig into why -pthread was added in the
first place as none of the executables, i.e. c_rehash, openssl and
the regression tests, seem to not require it like I wrote. Also the
in-base version of the openssl binary isn't linked against libc_r.
Is this something a future version of the regression tests will
require ?
Now if only NO_OPENSSL would get fixed...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030403211110.A999>