Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:26:24 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/vim Makefile Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.999999.0712201225180.967@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <20071220163124.GA46470@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200712191620.lBJGK237066497@repoman.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.0.999999.0712191133210.1294@ync.qbhto.arg> <20071220163124.GA46470@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:33:50AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to just convert the port to use the OPTIONS
>> framework?
>
> It already is if you define WITH_OPTIONS/WITH_VIM_OPTIONS.
I'm not sure why users would have to do that first, and I don't know of
any other ports that have this requirement.
If you're concerned that some of your users don't want OPTIONS, can you
flip the default?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.999999.0712201225180.967>