From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:22:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE0716A4EF for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7894E13C465 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCD91A4D7C; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC952C1D2; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:22:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:22:13 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-ID: <20070806052213.GA30845@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <20070806042330.GA30245@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708060449.l764nVxW031996@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708060449.l764nVxW031996@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:22:14 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > > that CF chip. > > > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > > > Kris > > > "script" output from a recent update : > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 > ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) > OK? [yes] > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 > ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' > ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons > umed 00:00:00) > ---> Updating dependency info > ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see whether they need to be updated? Kris