Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 01:00:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Felippe de Meirelles Motta <lippe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r321969 - in head/games/tuxpuck: . files Message-ID: <20130701010010.GA9325@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJcxwRRRy-6w3_DjkCczi_szPd8qdT7hHidZrqvN2pYNuhOKTw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201306281815.r5SIFUrh046811@svn.freebsd.org> <51CDEADE.4050908@passap.ru> <CAJcxwRRRy-6w3_DjkCczi_szPd8qdT7hHidZrqvN2pYNuhOKTw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:49:19PM -0300, Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Just not my custom to tell when it(PORTREVISION) is modified, but I can do > it from the next time. From now, I'll avoid very short log messages. As a committer, it's your responsibility to ensure that what's submitted is actually good enough to be committed. We should not always trust that it's 100% correct and provide next-to-zero checking. Naive port revision bumps were extensively discussed in the past on a number of different lists, including svn-ports-*, ports@, etc. It would be nice if we payed more attention to those discussions. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130701010010.GA9325>