Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:51:28 +1000 From: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD Message-ID: <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <1066789354.21430.39.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks, I have already looked over the repositories to determine how they differed. I wasn't really asking about the history of these changes in the other projects, but rather the history of why FreeBSD HASN'T also gone down this road. There doesn't appear to be anything in CVS or the mail archives that I can find that would indicate any intention to change the current implementation. Seeya...Q On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 18:29, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote: > > > Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done > > intentionally, or avoided in favour of some other yet to be implemented > > solution? Or is it still on someones todo list. > > You can consult the FreeBSD and OpenBSD CVS repositories > (http://cvsweb.freebsd.org, the equivalent OpenBSD URL is listed on > their website) to find the history of this code. I don't know if > there is any Linux source history browser because of the historical > lack of published revision control files for the kernel. > > Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1066816287.25609.34.camel>